Welcome To The Future

Here is a picture of the library in Cincinnati - which was demolished in 1955. 

So if you are wondering why nobody is using your drastically underfunded local library and can't figure out why it might close soon, the answer is because it doesn't look like this. I would spend all of my time, every single day of the week in the library if it looked even a fraction of this. 

Hanging out here would be an adventure in itself. There's nothing remotely exciting or indeed useful about looking at local papers, hiring cheap DVDs and then returning them to a convenient drop box because there are no staff left who know what you're talking about.

Try it. Try going into your local library and asking where they keep their John Creasey collection - or if they have anything by Sheridan Le Fanu. If they go for a keyboard, you must leave a pre-made post-it note on their screen that says:

"You are a shopkeeper, not a librarian."

It's time to face some harsh facts about this world. Some things were better before. Some things do need funding from the public purse. The money is still around - contrary to popular belief, we are still amongst the wealthiest nations in the world - the powers that be have simply decided the cash is better spent on other things. I can't comment on it politically because I don't follow that game enough to do so but if we can afford war and more airport terminals, we can afford real public library facilities that are worth going to war over.

Talking of airports, here's a promo pic of a PanAm 747 from the late 60s:

This is economy class too but the next stage of air travel will not make your coming flight an experience even remotely similar to going on holiday with the cast of Mad Men.

Here's a 1925 Rolls Royce Phantom:

That's nearly 100 years ago. Sure, it's a Roller but you would think somebody would have gone out on a limb and done something of this much value in the years in between.

Seems to me that the only advancements being made any more are inside computers, phones and vacuum cleaners. 

Is this really the world we created? When did it get so small? When did we become so easily pleased?

If you too want to sink into a mild depression about how the governments and companies that decorate our society think more about how much something costs than leaving something of value behind, you should follow @History_Pics on twitter. It's an eye opener for sure.

Me? I'm still working on a picture of my possessions that amounts to less than this one from Gandhi. Hopefully, when I die, I will have had to hand the keys to my car in already - or maybe I could spread my belongings out on the bonnet in a grand overblown display of irony.

I don't need glasses for reading, so that's one in the win column for me but man, those shoes look uncomfortable. You can probably find something similar if you drop into Next at the weekend.

Censorship on children's books? I don't think so...

In a press release that got forwarded on to me this week - one of my friends was obviously too lazy to write about it himself - it was suggested that books should have a rating system to protect children. Here's the first two paragraphs from the release: "The film industry has a rating system to prevent underage individuals from watching movies deemed inappropriate, but a recent study from Brigham Young University found that many children’s novels that contain high levels of profanity can be purchased and read by any child. The study set to be published in the May 2012 issue of Mass Communication and Society found that profanity occurred over half of the time in books on the New York Times 40 best-selling adolescent (ages 9-14) novels. Profanity ranged from extremely offensive to mild and then was broken down further into categories such as the Federal Communication Commission’s seven dirty words, sexual words, and words referring to human waste (i.e. crap)."

I'm not sure what to think about this. It's hard enough to get my kids to read anything at all. Will a ratings system make their pool of choices even smaller or will a sexy 18 icon on the cover make it all the more attractive? For somebody who thrives on books, the fact that both of my daughters are pretty lame-ass when it comes to loving books is disappointing to say the least. Daughter No 1 is getting on for 16. I think she has read one whole book in her life and it was an X-Men graphic novel about five years ago. She's coming up to her exam period now and she needs to read something pretty pronto. Over the years I have paraded everything I can think of in front of her ranging from Coraline, Stardust and Sandman at the top end, right across to Twilight but even that didn't hold any stock. Two weeks, ago I took the bull by the horns yet again and bought her a brand new copy of Carrie - my thinking being that maybe she would rise to the occasion and use it as a shock and awe tactic. I found out tonight that she has made it all the way to page 14. I've not looked but I have no doubt that the damn thing probably starts on page seven or nine, like most paperbacks.

We even go book shopping occasionally - on these trips, I tell her she can have whatever she wants and she has even made some pretty decent choices over the years but every single one of them has simply been piled on top of the last one on the shelf.

Conversely, Daughter Number 2 is slightly better. We're currently rolling through the Spiderwick series and are on book four. I know she's eleven but I bought a complete set of them for myself (in one smart volume - you should grab it here) and read it in an evening. We'll get there I guess. Not so concerned about that one. She made a start on Clive Barker's Thief of Always once and we got quite far with that too. I think the lure of Christmas killed that little adventure though.

Looking back, between 11 and 15, I can tell you exactly what I was reading. The list is seriously phenomenal - I'll give you a taster. My own books of choice were things like  Stephen King, James Herbert and no doubt some dubious looking Pan short horror story collections. I has a slick collection of all the Holmes books that I had bought myself, a rough as hell second hand collection of Russ Tobin books from Stanley Morgan, read Jaws and The Island by Peter Benchley that I pinched off my mum. Waded through the 007 series, Mickey Spillane, Ed McBain, Alistair Maclean that my old man had read and put on the shelf and then went even further back to chew up classics like The Toff series by John Creasey and The Saint that my uncle would leave at my grandmother's house whenever he flew in from Brussels. You can't beat some good old fashioned airport fodder. He also used to bring back these MAD Magazine paperbacks from his trips to the States which started a whole other type of love affair. At around 14, one of my friends found a pretty hardcore porn paperback called Hotel Orgy on his Dad's shelf and we passed that around too. There must have been at least ten of us that read it before it made it back home again. Rather than lead us on to 'harder' material, we went left of field to Leslie Thomas and discovered a whole other type of literature that seemed to be acceptable to read publicly even in school.

After that, I went back to horror, adventure - sometimes even got clever by tracking down the original text for the seminal Monkey show that was hot on TV back then. As I write this, all kinds of things are coming back to me: Dirty Harry movie tie-ins and spin-offs, Jack London's White Fang. I'll stop now but believe me, this is the very thin tip of the ice-berg. And yeah - we watched TV too. A hell of a lot of it. I also had a job. Two jobs by the time I was 15.

What's my point here? What good will censoring books do? It might stop kids buying age inappropriate material, but they will only get it somewhere else if they really want it - much like cigarettes, horror movies, booze, condoms and whatever else you need when you're underage and determined to get on with your life.

Here's the next paragraph from the press release:

“Some of the books in our sample had extremely high levels of profanity—one book had over 180 instances of the F-word alone. If these were made into movies, then there would be no question that they would be rated R; however, because they are in a book, we are somehow okay with adolescents being exposed to profanity in this degree. This is inconsistent and deserves discussion,” Dr. Sarah Coyne, the article’s author said. 

I'm not a bad Dad. Fact is, I'm a pretty great Dad with two really well balanced kids - they might even tell you that if you asked them - but we all live in the real world and all they have to do is come into the kitchen when I'm cooking and they can hear over 180 instances of 'fuck' in about five minutes. They're used to it. I'm a grown-up, I can swear. They are kids, so they can't. The exception to this, which I think is totally reasonable, is they have been taught that if they are ever approached by a stranger, they are to shout at the top of their lungs: "Get the fuck away from me motherfucker" and go for the eyes. We have not trialled this system but it made them laugh and they will remember it well if the need should ever arise. Anyway, here's the rest of the release:

“Hardly any research has examined books. We absolutely need to start focusing on this type of media in all aspects. Furthermore, there is almost no research on profanity in the media, even though the rating system tries to keep it away from younger kids. We don't know much about how prevalent it is, nor whether there are any effects of being exposed to profanity in the media,” Dr. Coyne said. The article titled, “A Helluva Read: Profanity in Adolescent Literature,”was written and researched by Drs. Sarah Coyne and Mark Callister, as well as Laura Ann Stockdale, David Nelson, and Brian Wells, all from Brigham Young University. It appears in Mass Communication and Society, Volume 15, Issue 3, 2012.

Dr Coyne needs a life - more likely though, he's probably been at university since he 'left' school and simply needs to get out more. Has he been in a school yard lately? Walked down a street? It's out there and I would much rather my kids were reading fucking books loaded with excitement and life affirming adventures than not. Sadly, I can't see that '18 sticker' making a whole lot of difference for me or them. Isn't this what they tried to do with the Comics Code logo?

I read all of these books spoken about above and hundreds more. I am well read. I am not stupid. I got by OK in school but the things that gave me a life, a job, a rapport, a girlfriend, a sense of humour, a reason to get up and a reason to go to bed where my books.

How I lost my kids to the Gods of anti-reading I'll never know but this is not the answer.

You know what, it's not even a problem.

Footnote: For the record, when we were 13 or 14, we went to see movies like Lemon Popsicle, Porky's, The Devil in Miss Jones, Bronx Warriors, Private Lessons - that's an endless list too. The ratings system didn't work then and it won't work now. Although to be fair, introducing multiplex cinemas and kicking the unholy crap out of indie cinema until it was forced to close would have stopped us, so well done everybody involved in that. Sitting in a cinema with your pals, surrounded by old men in big coats smoking unfiltered cigarettes in a movie you clearly shouldn't have been allowed in to see? Heaven. But that's a whole different story...